Mathea Lim
Associate Director
Mathea is an Associate Director at PKWA Law. Her areas of expertise include probate, child custody cases, and cases relating to the division on matrimonial assets. She has further advised on complex high-net-worth cases involving the division of assets and maintenance, as well as intricate child-related disputes. She previously worked in one of Singapore's largest law firms.
Awards and Recognition
Mathea was named one of “Singapore’s Rising Stars” in 2024 by Asian Legal Business, a distinguished accolade recognizing exceptional lawyers who exhibit outstanding potential and consistently receive high client commendations.
She received particular praise for her “formidable achievements in handling complex matrimonial cases, especially those involving high-net-worth clients and international elements.” Additionally, Mathea was acknowledged for her successful management of a divorce case involving assets worth $30 million.

Notable Cases and Achievements
- Mathea recently successfully acted for the Husband in the High Court, securing 72.5% of matrimonial assets ( XIK v XIL [2025] SGHCF 16).
- Mathea was the lead lawyer in a widely publicised case where she successfully represented her client in securing preschool fees from her ex-husband for their son (“Court orders man to pay son’s preschool fees to ex-wife”).
Mathea has been awarded the following scholarships and awards:
- Attaining a Distinction in the Part B Family Law Course in 2019.
- Receiving the prestigious LexisNexis Family Law Prize in December 2018, bestowed upon the top student in Family Law at NUS Law.
- Wee Chong Jin Scholarship in Law for the Academic Year 2018-2019.
- NUS Law Dean’s List during the Academic Year 2015-2016.
During her time in law school, Mathea exhibited her commitment to assisting others by serving as a founding director of the Student Disciplinary Assistance Scheme. In this role, she provided invaluable guidance to fellow students facing disciplinary proceedings before the Board of Discipline and Disciplinary Appeals Board.
Mathea’s journey to PKWA Law was preceded by her training at one of Singapore’s premier law firms, where she practiced as a litigation and family lawyer. Her true passion lies in offering support to individuals facing some of the most challenging moments in their lives. Mathea is highly regarded for her innovative thinking and her knack for finding practical, client-centric solutions.
She approaches her work with meticulous attention to detail and fervent advocacy, empowering her clients to grasp their legal positions fully and make informed choices throughout the divorce process. As a staunch proponent of therapeutic justice, she actively encourages the amicable resolution of disputes through mediation whenever it is a viable option.
Areas of practice
- Handling Court of Appeal matters
- Managing both contentious and non-contentious divorces
- Addressing jurisdictional issues
- Resolving child custody disputes
- Navigating maintenance matters
- Overseeing the equitable division of assets
- Crafting marital and separation agreements
- Addressing family violence concerns
- High net worth divorces and family disputes
- Dealing with cross-border international disputes
- Addressing child abduction cases
- Managing relocation issues
- Crafting pre-nuptial agreements
- Formulating financial separation agreements
- Handling personal protection matters
- Managing interim maintenance applications and trials
- Resolving contested ancillary issues
- Addressing adoption matters
Gek T
Chan Ter Yue
Daryl Lsl
Daniel Tan
Gek T
Chan Ter Yue
Daryl Lsl
Daniel Tan
Legal articles by Mathea Lim
- Working for a competing business
- Starting a competing business
- Soliciting clients from a former employer
- Soliciting colleagues from a former employer
- Working within a geographical area
Are non-compete clauses enforceable in Singapore?
In short, it depends. Due to the lack of a legislative framework, the enforceability of non-compete clauses is guided by the court’s decisions in previous cases. Over time, a two-part criterion has been established to assist the court in determining whether such clauses should be enforced, as follows:- Does the clause protect a legitimate proprietary interest of the employer?
- Is the scope of the non-compete clause reasonable?
Legitimate proprietary interest of the employer
This generally refers to an interest of the business that it would be reasonable to protect. The courts have stated three types of proprietary interests will be considered legitimate for the purposes of a non-compete clause. They are:- Trade secrets;
- Trade connections; and
- Maintaining a stable, trained workforce.
Reasonableness
The court will then consider whether the non-compete clause is reasonable, both in respect of the interests of the parties and those of the public. The law has been developed to avoid overly restrictive clauses, but whether it is reasonable will depend on the type of employment and industry. Regarding the employee’s interests, a person’s future employment may be significantly hindered if their non-compete clause prevents them from working within a wide geographical area for an indefinite duration. Conversely, a non-compete clause that only applies to a small geographical area and lasts, say, 12 months, is more likely to be reasonable. In terms of the interests of the public, overly restrictive non-compete clauses will impact freedom of trade and competition, which is a fundamental aspect of business, giving the public the ability to choose. The court will, therefore, want to avoid a situation where one business monopolises a particular industry. In assessing reasonableness, the court will look at several factors, including:- Whether the clause is specific to the employee; if so, it is more likely to be considered reasonable.
- What the employee is restricted from doing. A general restriction preventing an employee from working for any competitor in any geographical area is more likely to be unreasonable.
- Duration of the clause. It is more likely to be reasonable if the restriction only lasts for a set duration. A longer period will usually be reasonable for an employee who works at a more senior level.
- Geographical limitations. Depending on the type of business, it may be reasonable for an employee to be restricted from carrying out business in a specific country, region, or city. However, any geographical restraints must be necessary and justified and should not disproportionately impact competition.
Unenforceable non-compete clauses
If the court finds the two criterions above are not met, the non-compete clause will not be enforceable. A mechanism known as the “blue pencil test” will allow the court to strike out the unreasonable parts of the clause, meaning the rest of it can stay in force. This avoids the need for the entire clause or contract to be rewritten, which the court could not do in any event. Alternatively, if the entire non-compete clause is found to be unreasonable, it can be struck out, leaving the rest of the contract in force.Enforcing a non-compete clause
If an employee breaches a non-compete clause that is valid and reasonable, the employer may apply to the court for either of the following:- An injunction to prevent the employee from committing the breach; and/or
- Compensation for any financial loss suffered due to the breach.
Things for the employer to consider
A business that wants to include a non-compete clause in its contracts will want to avoid a situation where the clause is challenged or deemed unenforceable. Seeking the assistance of an employment lawyer to draft the employment contract will ensure the non-compete clause is drafted properly. However, there are also some general guidelines employers can follow:- Ensure any restrictions on the employee are reasonable. The employer should only restrict what is necessary to ensure the business’s legitimate interests are protected.
- Make the clause specific to the employee. Blanket restrictions that apply to all employees are unlikely to be enforceable, particularly considering the varying roles and responsibilities in different companies.
- Avoid ambiguity. A dispute or unenforceability is much less likely to arise if the clause clarifies which activities the employee is prevented from doing.
Things for the employee to consider
A future employee may be tempted to sign their non-compete agreement without fully understanding its implications. The law will seek to protect employees from unjustified restrictions, as we have seen above. However, they should still take the time to review the contract and obtain clarification on any elements they are unsure of. If presented with a non-compete clause, employees should consider doing the following:- Speak to an employment lawyer. They will be able to advise the employee on the terms of the agreement and whether it is reasonable and capable of enforcement.
- Speak to the employer. After reviewing the agreement and taking advice from a lawyer, the employee may be concerned that parts of the non-compete clause are overly restrictive. The employee is wholly entitled to negotiate these terms with the employer or, at the very least, seek clarification from them.
- Keep a note of any changes. The employment contract will be the final version, including any amendments, as signed by both parties. The employee should keep a copy of the contract and note any subsequent amendments, just in case of any dispute. It is also sensible to keep a record of any discussions had with the employer about the terms of the non-compete agreement, as these may need to be referred to if the matter ends up in court.
Conclusion on non-compete clauses in Singapore
Non-compete clauses are an effective mechanism for providing businesses with confidence when hiring employees at all levels of their business. It is reasonable for employees’ activities to be restricted to a degree so that standard business interests can be protected. However, non-compete clauses used as an attempt to disproportionately restrict trade and employment will not be recognised by the court and will be deemed unenforceable. It is expected that the guidance due to be released in the latter half of 2024 will shed further light on the effective use of such clauses, thereby providing further clarity on this complex area of the law." ["post_title"]=> string(32) "Non-Compete Clauses in Singapore" ["post_excerpt"]=> string(0) "" ["post_status"]=> string(7) "publish" ["comment_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["ping_status"]=> string(4) "open" ["post_password"]=> string(0) "" ["post_name"]=> string(29) "non-compete-clauses-singapore" ["to_ping"]=> string(0) "" ["pinged"]=> string(0) "" ["post_modified"]=> string(19) "2024-04-13 18:26:22" ["post_modified_gmt"]=> string(19) "2024-04-13 10:26:22" ["post_content_filtered"]=> string(0) "" ["post_parent"]=> int(0) ["guid"]=> string(45) "https://singaporefamilylawyers.com.sg/?p=3882" ["menu_order"]=> int(0) ["post_type"]=> string(4) "post" ["post_mime_type"]=> string(0) "" ["comment_count"]=> string(1) "0" ["filter"]=> string(3) "raw" } [2]=> object(WP_Post)#8953 (24) { ["ID"]=> int(997) ["post_author"]=> string(1) "2" ["post_date"]=> string(19) "2022-06-11 09:35:34" ["post_date_gmt"]=> string(19) "2022-06-11 01:35:34" ["post_content"]=> string(2423) "How does a Divorce differ from a Deed of Separation?
In order to end a marriage legally, you must go through the process of divorce. However, sometimes you might not yet be ready for a divorce and may wish to try living apart from each other instead. In this situation, you can use a written Separation Agreement. This is a contract in law that the couple use to record how they have agreed to separate, and how the divorce should be carried out. The date when parties began living apart is recorded in the Deed of Separation, so often the divorce will be based on that ground of separation.What terms should be included in a Deed of Separation?
The terms of agreement on issues such as the following should be noted in the Deed of Separation:- The reason the divorce is taking place
- When the divorce proceedings will begin
- Who will begin the divorce proceedings
- If children are involved, how care, custody and control duties have been arranged
- How the marital assets should be dealt with whilst the divorce is happening
- Any interim arrangement that the parties made until the beginning or conclusion of the divorce proceedings
- Any spousal or child maintenance agreements.
Divorce papers still need to be filed
To be effective, both parties to the marriage have to sign the Deed of Separation. Remember that simply signing a Deed of Separation does not mean that the divorce has happened – you still need to file for divorce. This is because a Deed of Separation is not filed with a court, so even though the parties have signed it, the court and any relevant government departments will not be made aware of it.When is a Deed of Separation most useful for me?
You’ll find the deed most useful when:- You want to separate from your partner, but you have young children or financial issues which makes it a bad time to get a divorce.
- You’re not sure if a divorce it what you want, but you wish to try living apart from your spouse.
- You don’t fulfil the other criteria for getting a divorce (the grounds of adultery or unreasonable behaviour), and both of you agree that the marriage was a mistake.